Criteria HIGH DN
85 – 100% DISTINCTION
75%- 84% CREDIT
65% – 74% P1
55% – 64% P2
50% – 54% F1
49%- 40% F2
39%-0
PART A As for DN AND
Exceptional, analytical background arguments and RQ
(referenced)
Five exemplary key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).
Demonstrates original thought, exceptional analysis of 4 primary research papers.
Exceptional critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant.
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates exceptional integration of relevant additional literature.
Exceptional critical recommendations.
As for CR AND
Comprehensive background and research question (referenced).
Five highly applicable key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).
Comprehensive, in-depth critical understanding and analysis of 4 primary research papers
Comprehensive
implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates high level integration of relevant additional literature, impressive.
Innovative recommendations.
As for P1 AND
Thorough, detailed description of background and research question (referenced).
Five thorough, detailed key messages synthesised from the relevant primary research papers (referenced).
Advanced critical analysis of outcomes from 4 primary research papers.
Thorough, detailed critical implementation of results to improve practice research, education, policy, as relevant
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates thorough, detailed integration of more than 3 relevant additional literature sources.
Thorough, detailed recommendations. Adequately completed all components of assignment. Competent, accurate description of background and research question (referenced).
Four primary research articles listed correctly.
Five relevant key messages synthesised from the primary research papers (referenced).
Adequate critical analysis of 4 primary research papers.
Adequate, accurate critical implementation of results to improve practice and research, education, policy, as relevant
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates adequate use of 3 relevant additional literature sources.
Some descriptive level critical analysis.
Adequate recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Limited basic, mostly accurate description of background & research question (referenced).
Four primary research articles listed correctly.
Some repetition, some superficial elements in the 5 key messages synthesised from 4 primary research papers (referenced).
Basic understanding
Superficial analysis of 4 primary research papers.
Limited basic implementation of results to improve practice and other areas, as relevant
Analysis of review outcomes demonstrates limited/basic use of less than 3 relevant additional literature sources
Mostly descriptive – minimal critical analysis.
Limited and /or basic recommendations for practice, research, education, policy Unclear, poor, inaccurate description of background and RQ / / RQ. missing
No references
Less than 4 primary research articles listed.
Less than four relevant or incorrect key messages from 4 or less than 4 primary research papers (problems with referencing).
Poor and/or unrelated
analysis of 4 or less than 4 primary research papers. Not critical.
Poor, inadequate and/or unrelated,
implementation of results for practice and other areas,
No additional relevant literature
Irrelevant recommendations for practice, research, education, policy As for F1 AND
Did not complete most
assignment components
Incorrect irrelevant
missing
content in sections
Explanations missing, lacking
not supported.
No references
PART B
(500 words) As for DN AND
Exceptional critique and exemplary understanding of how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.
Sophisticated ability to integrate an impressive range of relevant literature.
As for CR AND
In-depth critique & comprehensive understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.
Discussion supported by wide range of relevant literature.
As for P1 AND
Thorough, detailed critique and insightful understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence their practice as a new RN.
Discussion supported by more than 3 sources of relevant literature.
Presents adequate critique & sound understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence practice as a new RN.
Discussion supported by 2-3 sources of relevant literature from the course.
3rd person writing Limited, basic description and understanding about how their learning in Nursing Project will influence practice as a new RN. Some lack of clarity, minimal depth.
No additional relevant literature.
3rd person writing
No images Poor and/or unrelated description about how course learning will influence the student’s practice as a new RN.
Referred to their own project OR other courses
No relevant literature used.
1st person writing
Images used As for F1 AND
Unclear
Missing
Irrelevant
Overall
quality of
writing
Poster presentation As for DN, plus
Exceptional creative flair in layout; impressive use of colour.
Succinctly expresses insightful and original thought using exemplary poster presentation skills.
Adheres to all writing guidelines.
As for Credit, plus
Impressive creative flair in layout; fonts; use of colour.
Succinctly expresses ideas high impact images and poster presentation skills.
Adheres to all writing guidelines
As for Pass 1, plus
Visually appealing and competently prepared in layout; use of colour,
Very relevant images
Adheres to all writing guidelines
Satisfactory appeal, effective layout; use of colour.
Appropriate use and size of images in Part A – no more than 20% of text box
Adheres to most writing guidelines in Part B re: sentence structure, grammar, spelling, use of 3rd person, use of inclusive language,
mostly sequenced, logical flow. Basic layout; some problems with fonts and use of colour.
Some images irrelevant
Images so small – can’t see detail, so irrelevant
Images had limited impact
Too much text.
Vague, limited
Inadequate lacking in clarity in some areas
Problems in Part B with: sentence structure,
grammar, spelling,
punctuation, use of 3rd person, inclusive language, flow Poorly presented, little appeal busy, difficult to read due to problems with font and colour.
No images
All images irrelevant
No connection to research question.
Poor logic
Template altered
Sections deleted.
Did not adhere to most writing guidelines 1st person
Below word limit 2016 Template not used.
No logic
Incoherent writing style, grammatical spelling errors.
Adheres to few guidelines.
Significantly below word limit
Referencing & Academic Integrity
Adherence
to UniSA (date) Harvard author-date system As for Credit As for Credit Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing and Reference List Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, with no evidence of plagiarism. Few minor errors
Reference list is complete, mostly correct formatting.
No omissions. Mostly correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing, no evidence of plagiarism.
Reference list has some inconsistencies in formatting and omissions
In-text referencing is incomplete.
Reference list incorrect or incomplete. Some evidence of plagiarism.
Possible referral to AIO No references in text. No reference list.
Evidence of extensive plagiarism
This Assessment 2 is worth 55% of your final grade and the equivalent of 2,500 words. The word equivalent means that the work you do to complete this assignment is taken into account so the total word count in the 3 slides will be less than 2,500 actual words.
You are required to develop a power point slide (Part A) that could be presented as a poster to disseminate the results of your research project. You will identify five (5) key messages and the implementation of results for practice. In Part B, you will discuss what you have learned in Nursing Project and how you think this knowledge will influence your practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse.
Objectives being assessed:
CO 4 – Identify the implications and make recommendations for nursing
CO 5 – Design a poster presentation in order to disseminate findings
Your assignment must adhere to the following format:
– Download the Assignment 2 template located in the Assessments folder to use.
– Do Not re-format the Template in any way or add any additional slides.
– Part B: use 1.5 spacing, write in 3rd person, and use references as relevant.
– Correct use of UniSA Harvard author-date system for in-text referencing and Reference List.
ASSIGNMENT 2 TEMPLATE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS:
Part A: Slide: (1200 words equivalent)
Include the following information in the specified areas and reference correctly:
– Project Title and your name and student ID
– Introduction, background, research question.
– List five (5) relevant key messages from your research project results.
– Discuss implementation of results for clinical practice and/or education and policy in relation to your research question.
– Recommendations for clinical practice and/or research, education and policy.
– Use 3-4 images if relevant. No more than 20% of the size in the text box.
Part B (500 words approx)
Think about what you have learned in Nursing Project. Describe how you think this knowledge will influence your clinical practice as a newly qualified Registered Nurse. Write in 3rd person and use references as relevant.
Reference List: Present on a new slide and use correct UniSA Harvard author-date